Samsung 9110. Karmalicious
As though in some kind of Karmic re-aligning effort, watchphones seem to the be one of the things that mobile phone manufacturers are concentrating their efforts on at the moment. First we had the LG GD910 announced as hitting our shelves next month. And, obscenely expensive as it is, it looks pretty damn lovely. Now Samsung have slipped in there with their own effort, cheekily doing so with a release date that’s even earlier than the LG, and a price tag that’s less than half. Ouch. And the Samsung S9110 still seems like a stonker, with it’s TFT capacitive touchscreen, it’s Bluetooth and Outlook connectivity, and in many other things that this Samsung S9110 review will tell you about.
So, why Karmic, you ask? Well, we don’t think we’re going to be alone in claiming this, but: we haven’t worn a watch in over ten years, and pretty much the sole reason is because of mobile phones. Why, when you can carry a date/time/calendar sporting thing in your pocket, would you then also want to splash out for something to give you date/time (and nothing else) that you then strap to your wrist? Unless you really need those few accumulative seconds you’ll save each day by looking at it… So, after probably hitting the watch market all over the place for the last decade or so, it seems only fair that things like the Samsung S9110 start to bring back some love for the watch, right?
But, what’s that you say? This doesn’t make any difference at all, because the watchmakers still won’t be making any profit? And the mobile phone manufacturers will just be making even more profit.
Ah. Right. Yeah. Good point.
Oh well, sod it: line their pockets, go look at these Samsung S9110 deals. It’s not like they’re going to get any poorer.
Do you think, when you read about a new businessphone: oh wow, look at that, a little business inside a phone. I wish they could make it more like an actual business. Maybe give it some little tiny employees to work inside and perhaps exploit and work for minimum wage. No, you don’t.
As a Honda ad asked us recently (and rhetorically): isn’t it nice when things just work? Well, yes it is. And with the
It’s all in the name. Even if the name is one of those silly, long, pretentious and ridiculously numbered names that mobile phone companies are so fond of. Why not just the Samsung Omnia 2? Why the need for that full
One of the worst things about all the touchscreen phones we’ve come across recently is that too many seem to have had their UI’s imported from earlier, none-touchscreen versions of the phones. This most often means that while you’re using your fingers or thumbs to navigate, you still aren’t convinced the phone you’re using is a full touchscreen device. Not so with Samsung, who’s nifty TouchWiz interface is now up to version 2.0 and is improving in leaps and bounds. Designed from scratch with the touchscreen user in mind, it allows all your tapping, scrolling and dragging to feel as naturally in tune with the phone’s function as possible.
Jekyll and Hyde. That’s all someone needed to say: Jeckyll and Hyde. Someone, somewhere at some point should have just yelled those words out at any of the early meetings Samsung must have held about the upcoming
That is the big question. We are used to seeing manufacturers look to prolong the product lifecycle of their handsets by adding additional features, with limited success. Can Samsung buck the trend with the announcement of the
The newly released Smartphone, the